ACTrader Scalper

[e1vis]

On pepperstone standard I had 7 sells for a total of +49 pips.
I have no idea what is going on at ICM.

And I still have a buy open in dd. Getting very frustrated with this..!

[Highlander]

1 buy. closed in -5.4pips  on ICM

[e1vis]

1 buy. closed in -5.4pips  on ICM

Just closed mine manually for -16 pips. Need to find an alternative solution, ICM isn't working here!

[websmith]

Advertisement

I really do not know guys why do you buy such EA?
1. There is no 12 years backtest at the vendor web site. Does it mean that EA was a loser before 2010 year?
2. Bad reward to risk. EA should win 2 trades in order to cover one losing trade.
3. Insane relative drawdown 63% here http://scalper.actraderea.com/tests/ACTraderScalper1.1_tickdata.htm
4. EA works on 1 minute period. This means that EA is not robust: inefficiency that it uses can disappear from the market at any moment and EA will become useless. It is broker dependent.

[swordfish]

Insane relative drawdown 63% here http://scalper.actraderea.com/tests

Incorrect reading
DD 26.3%
Reward/Risk 1.55
Win/loss 74% short and 71% long

All mean nothing since it is demo.

[websmith]

Relative drawdown   63.31% (1508.14)
http://scalper.actraderea.com/tests/ACTraderScalper1.1_tickdata.htm
and will be more on live account with such risk.

[lxboston]

Giving this a run on demo. Lets see how we go.

[Highlander]

anybody tried this on IBFX or Fxpro?

[Anchorpoint]

Giving this a run on demo. Lets see how we go.

Demo is useless on this EA. It is broker dependent and could be big diff between demo and live.
Put it on live account on minimum lotsize for a month and evaluate then.

[hagenuk]

On pepperstone standard I had 7 sells for a total of +49 pips.
I have no idea what is going on at ICM.

Hi odysseus11, do you mind sharing your trades via myfxbook if you have ? I'm running in Pepperstone Razor(Non Edge) and it was horribles....  

[Eddi Megabot]

Relative drawdown   63.31% (1508.14)
http://scalper.actraderea.com/tests/ACTraderScalper1.1_tickdata.htm
and will be more on live account with such risk.

One is relative DD (63%) and the other is maximal DD (26%). I'm wondering what is the difference.

maximal DD is clear: You have 100$ on the account and after the maximal DD of 26% you have 74$ on the account.
But relative DD? 

[Anchorpoint]

Relative drawdown   63.31% (1508.14)
http://scalper.actraderea.com/tests/ACTraderScalper1.1_tickdata.htm
and will be more on live account with such risk.

One is relative DD (63%) and the other is maximal DD (26%). I'm wondering what is the difference.

maximal DD is clear: You have 100$ on the account and after the maximal DD of 26% you have 74$ on the account.
But relative DD? 

Relative is from the equity peak in your account

[flatour]

Hi,
I am going to make a comparison of brokers.
Anyone who has datas to share can contact me.
Especially interested in Pepper Live or Demo Razor or normal, FXopen Live or Demo.
EA is good if we adjust the risk. Large accounts must use risk 0-4 max.

[swordfish]

When you compare brokers, the swap makes a huge difference.  Some liquidity providers update swap frequently, some don't.  Zero swap account is usually from B-booking brokers (market makers).  Not saying it is bad.

Hi,
I am going to make a comparison of brokers.
Anyone who has datas to share can contact me.
Especially interested in Pepper Live or Demo Razor or normal, FXopen Live or Demo.
EA is good if we adjust the risk. Large accounts must use risk 0-4 max.

[lxboston]

I am starting it on pepperstone live tomorrow with $500 will post myfxbook here when I set it up.

Cheers